THE ONE-WAY STREET OF INTEGRATION: FAIR HOUSING AND THE PURSUIT OF RACIAL JUSTICE IN AMERICAN CITIES

Book ID/图书代码： 03360020C00094

English Summary/英文概要： The One-Way Street of Integration examines two contrasting housing policy approaches to achieving racial justice. Integration initiatives and community development efforts have been for decades contrasting means of achieving racial equity through housing policy. Edward G. Goetz doesn’t see the solution to racial injustice as the government moving poor and nonwhite people out of their communities, and by tracing the tensions involved in housing integration and policy across fifty years and myriad developments he shows why. Goetz’s core argument, in a provocative book that shows today’s debates about housing, mobility, and race have deep roots, is that fair housing advocates have adopted a spatial strategy of advocacy that has increasingly brought it into conflict with community development efforts. The One-Way Street of Integration critiques fair housing integration policies for targeting settlement patterns while ignoring underlying racism and issues of economic and political power. Goetz challenges liberal orthodoxy, determining that the standard efforts toward integration are unlikely to lead to racial equity or racial justice in American cities. In fact, in this pursuit it is the community development movement rather than integrated housing projects that has the greatest potential for connecting to social change and social justice efforts.

Chinese Summary/中文概要： 《一体化的单行道》考察了实现种族公正的两种截然不同的住房政策方法。融合行动和社区发展努力几十年来一直是通过住房政策实现种族平等的两种截然不同的手段。戈茨并不认为政府项目能解决种族不公平的问题，因为它把穷人和非白人赶出了自己的社区，他通过追踪50年来住房整合和政策中出现的紧张局势，以及无数的发展，揭示了其中的原因。戈茨的核心论点是，公平住房的倡导者采用了一种空间策略，这种策略越来越与社区发展努力相冲突。《一体化的单行道》批评公平的住房一体化政策，这些政策针对的是定居模式，而忽视了潜在的种族主义和经济和政治权力问题。戈茨对自由主义的正统观念提出了挑战，他认为，在美国城市中，标准的一体化努力不太可能带来种族平等或种族正义。事实上，在这方面，社区发展运动（而不是综合住房项目）最有可能与社会变革和社会正义努力相联系。（WYL）

Awards/获奖情况：“一个勇敢的工作，在戈茨面临一个困难的辩论正面……戈茨对他认为的前进方向给出了明确的指导。”——《规划教育与研究杂志》

“应该刺激辩论。”——选择

"A courageous work in that Goetz confronts a difficult debate head on.... Goetz gives clear guidance about what he believes to be the way forward."--Journal of Planning Education and Research

"Should stimulate debate." --Choice

About the Author/作者介绍： 爱德华•戈茨是明尼苏达大学城市与区域规划教授和城市与区域事务中心主任。他出版了很多书，最近的一本是《新政废墟》。

Edward G. Goetz is Professor of Urban and Regional Planning and Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota. He has published widely, including, most recently, New Deal Ruins.

Format:

Rights Status/版权销售情况：Simplified Chinese/简体中文：AVAILABLE

Complex/Traditional Chinese/繁体中文：AVAILABLE

Sales in other countries/其他国家销售情况：

原文第一章内容：暂无

手稿：暂无

大纲：暂无